|
Although our belief is that the
system is what is broken,
because it has no real
accountability, is a monopoly
and is government run;
the judges in this system
must take responsibility for the
damage this system causes to
children and families.
They are charged with the
decisions, broad discretion and
essential your children's
future. Your future income will
be at the whim of a fallible
human being, who is no doubt
overloaded with cases. However,
what they do is completely
unconstitutional and harmful to
children and families. They have
no "feedback loop" to understand
when they are successful and
when they are cause great
damage. No business in the real
world would survive this way.
No judge has the
authority to assign custody or
meddle in the family affairs
until and unless a parent is
PROVEN unfit to the level of
"strict scrutiny (U.S. Supreme
Court). However, these just
assign mothers custody in
informal hearings without even
any TESTIMONY that this father
is unfit. The sexual
bias and antiquated beliefs of
this system about what is best
for children is unbelievable
outdated and ignorant.
It defies common sense, nature
and scientific proof for the
profits and self-interests of
people in the system.
Anyone going to a supermarket on
Saturday morning will see
fathers taking their children
and teaching them lessons in
different ways that mothers do
not. It is simple
scientific fact that
children of divorce do better
with 50-50 time with both
parents. However, the system
does not want to admit that due
to the BILLIONS in federal
kickbacks to states for children
support and BILLION more in
legal fees caused by this system
for custody battles. A legal
presumption of Shared Custody
will become law in all 50 states
in time, but in the interim
MILLION of children will be
permanently harmed by separation
from their fathers. This is
criminal incompetent all around
for the "professional" in this
system who have a responsibility
to improve the system (part of a
lawyers oath ignored daily by
them for greed).
From
Mass News:
Massachusetts
Ranked 45th in the Nation
by its Own Lawyers:
By MassNews Staff
Many people have written about
the content of the radio ad
where we say: "Businesses
avoid moving to states with
slow unsteady courts. We were
ranked by lawyers as 45th
in the nation."
It's a direct quote from the
" News
Release" of the "Visiting
Committee on Management in
the Courts."
The quote was: "In a
2001 U.S. Chamber of Commerce
survey of corporate attorneys.
"It is sad comment that
the public is so uneducated,
unconcerned and blinded to
the TRUTH by the media, and
that the Judiciary of our
once great Nation has been
allowed to sink to these depths.
And while I say that the conditions
that exist today can be laid
at one doorstep, that of the
Judiciary, I must ultimately
say that the fault really
lies at our feet, We the People,
for it is We the People who
have allowed the foxes to
guard the henhouse."
-- Robert H. Bork,
Judge, Supreme Court Nominee
& Professor of Law
Code
of Judicial Conduct
|
Judge |
Submitted
By |
Accusation/Charge
or Breach of Duty |
|
Judge Locke - Milford
District Court |
condor68@comcast.net |
Erratic
behavior, yelling,
lack of knowledge
about or caring about
the law, rumored to
brag about "overturning
the Massachusetts Appeals
Court
every day".
Issues restraining
orders when the statute
requirements are not
met to any woman who
asks for one. This
destroys children
and family bonds
with the father.
Does he know the
damage he does?
This judge is a
holocaust for
children. He
is either
incompetent or
willfully evil. Refused full
evidentiary hearings
and questioning of
witnesses, which are
required by Mass.
appeals court case
law on renewal of
all restraining orders.
Therefore his orders
are legally
void - yet the
victim (man) usually
has an illegal overhanging
order that likely
still cause arrest
and many other damages
at any time.
When motioned to have
the required proper
hearing another judge
refuses to even hear
the motion -- illegal
again and a catch-22
to drop men in a hole
with no rope or due
process recourse.
This is abuse of power,
abuse of discretion
and actually technically
"treason"
against the U.S. for
violation his oath
of office, civil rights
and federal laws.
Holds ex-parte hearings
that change restraining
orders without notice
to other side.
Illegal actions and
lack of respect for
the law.
|
|
Judge Armand Fernandes
Bristol County ..... New
Bedford and Fall River
courthouses. |
|
My name is Jim
Feeney. I have been
through a very
adversarial divorce,
Judgment in January
2006. I had and
still have Judge
Armand Fernandes who
is totally biased
and prejudiced,
abuses his judicial
powers and is unfit
to be a Judge. My
ex-wife's attorney
has done nothing but
lie and create
perception. Judge
Fernandes believes
every word as
gospel, hasn't
required him to
prove one thing and
has blocked all
evidence I offered
to refute my
ex-wife's attorney's
accusations.
I had three
different lawyers
early on in the
divorce, none that
did a thing to
protect my
interests, I had two
Complaints for
Contempt that cost
me $2, 500 each for
my ex-wife's
attorney's fees for
failure of my
attorney to provide
required discovery
they were given by
me. I ended up
representing myself
and got railroaded
by Judge Fernandes.
Fernandes broke the
law, interpreted the
law to persecute me,
acted as defense
attorney for my
ex-wife, prosecuting
attorney against me
and Judge all at the
same time ... making
my ex-wife's
attorney's job
simple.
In recent Complaints
for Contempt actions
I hired an attorney
to represent me.
Fernandes blocked
testimony and
evidence we had to
present and took the
word of my ex-wife's
attorney as truth
without requiring a
stitch of evidence.
My ex-wife's
attorney said they
had documents they
never ended up
producing in four
days of hearings.
Fernandes was so
blatantly biased he
sustained my
attorney's
questioning without
an objection being
made. When my
attorney said,
Excuse me Your Honor
but there hasn't
been an objection,
Fernandes asked my
ex-wife's attorney
if he'd like to
object. He half
stood up and said
"object". Fernandes
said "Sustained,
next question." The
man is out of
control.
Another Person:
Judge Fernandes is
horrible. I attended
court with a friend
of mine for support.
He does not read
brief's and seems to
like to hear himself
talk? According to
the attorney; one
never knows how this
judge is going to
rule? He is
unreliable with no
consistency when it
is involving a
ruling...
Another Case Against
this HORRIBLE Judge:
I'm afraid to tell
you my name because
Armand Fernandes of
the Bristol Probate
Court is still my
judge and will be in
the future, as my
docket has been
assigned to him. He
is an AWFUL judge.
He intentionally
blocked me from my
ability to present
proof to rebut a
false accusation,
(which was an
obvious and
established pattern
of retaliation on
the defendants
part), had multiple,
"in chambers",
meetings with the
lawyers of which I
was not allowed to
be present, refused
to allow me to cross
examine a witness,
despite the fact
that he had allowed
me to cross examine
previous witnesses,
repeatedly made
derogatory comments
toward me
personally,
repeatedly stood up
from the bench and
screamed at the top
of his lungs at me
for the sole purpose
of intimidation,
answered for the
witnesses on the
stand, (in essence,
giving them the
answers to difficult
questions), verses
having them answer
themselves, deliberately
intimidated my
lawyer out of
presenting a legal
argument by
threatening him with
the possibility
of disbarment, asked
the opposing
attorney if he
objects to documents
I wanted to present,
(when attorney
didn't think to
do this himself),
ignored the results
and findings of an
investigator's
report that he
himself assigned to
the case,
participated in
attempting to coerce
me into settling the
case, (verses having
the trial), by
insisting,
(literally for
years), that the
parties try to
settle, took over my
lawyer's questioning
of witnesses and
acted as defense
attorney for the
opposing party,
threatened me with
jail, etc, etc, etc.
I was the
plaintiff,
completely innocent
of any and all wrong
doing... his
inexplicable bias was
a BLATANT display of
abuse of his power
which he used
to protect the
guilty party.
|
| |
|
|
|
Judge David Fuller
- Head justice
of the Hampden County
Probate Court |
Steve Shapardson |
Sexist
Statements and rulings.
Fuller issues order
for visits with children.
Mother interferes
with visits, Fuller
refuses to enforce
his own order but
says if you bring
this matter back I
will remove your joint
legal. |
|
Judge Rockett, Middlesex |
mcarusi@charter.net |
Not
enforcing his own
court ordered visitation
and denying father
his visitation rights
when wife violated
visitation approximately
70% of the time for
6 months.
Second Victim
of Judge Rockett:
Middlesex 3rd District.
On May 25h, 2005
after Spencer Kagan
rescues from my
case, he assigns
me over to Rockett
on five (5) contempt
charges. Rockett
never even comes
out of chambers,
identifies the parties
& attorney's
nor does he view
any of the evidence.
Rockett just
signs off on all
of the contempt
charges, behind
closed doors. NOT
justice, an inside
job, from Kagan
to Rockett.
Coffee anyone or
perhaps a drink
at the Inn @ Harvard?
AVA Peer Rated or
Fellowship of Matrimonial
Lawyers...dinner
for you!
|
|
Judge Fuller |
mp5983@msn.com,
Mark Perry |
Stealing
from middleclass white
males and disbursing
all assets to his
friends and the State.
Knowingly ignoring
contempt of visitation.
My son has been kidnapped
and held for ransom
for over five years.
I have not seen him
nor do I know where
he is. Even though
I am and was a perfectly
fit parent. Fuller
has excepted
moneys to flow to
enrich himself on
the backs of the
struggling middle
class white male.
As a Harvard graduate
he extorts millions
from the middle class
to maintain the status
quo of the rich 10%
he protects.
Total disregard for
the law. The total
and blatant failure
to allow any due possess
as he is required
to do as stated in
his oath of office
is treason against
the United States
of America. Harassment:
He has personally
harassed me from the
bench. For no logical
reason. |

Judge Kagan, Middlesex |
|
Issues
sexually biased orders.
When overturned on
appeal continues to
ignore appeals court
and harasses men with
further legal mazes,
appeals, fees and
bad orders. He
illegally re-wrote
a pre-nup. Was overturned
on appeal. Also in
same case tried to
re-write terms of
a trust. unsuccessfully.
Copied factually wrong
findings from wife's
attorney...word for
word. Said husband's
income was unverifiable..even
though his only source
of income is as a
full-time employee
of a large company
(Morgan Stanley).
Has been overturned
two times out of two
appeals in the last
three months. Has
five others pending.
Has been told by appeals
court to correct many
mistakes and continues
to do what he wants
instead of what higher
court ordered.
Findings
of Appeals court at
great cost to father:
A valid pre or postnuptial
agreement may not
be altered by a judge
(Korff v. Korff Mass.
2005 Mass. Appeals
Court).
Masters
fees to Mr. Bowser
for the returned case
now exceed $34,000
to fix the errors
of this judge. It
seems the master and
Kagan have conspired
against Mr. Korff and
Kagan will most likely
need to be appealed
again if he adopts
the Master's findings.
What Bowser now
is recommending to
Kagan is to
reclassify a portion
of the alimony illegally
ordered by Kagan and
call it child
support. In effect
retroactively increasing
child support to offset
Mr. Korff's court
ordered alimony overpayments...even
though Kagan's original
judgment included
a child support award
that he said was made
totally independent
from the alimony award.
Child support cannot
be retroactively increased
before any modification
date. It is a federal
law. Judge
Kagan is in contempt
of court...refusing
to vacate his judgment
in a timely fashion
and ordering Mr. Korff
to pay huge sums to
correct a mistake
that he made!!!!
This court decides
child support and
alimony each and every
day...why should this
decision be farmed
out to a friend of
the judge at Mr. Korff's
expense? How do you
spell CORRUPTION!!!!!!!???
Just outrageous.
It was later
discovered that
Kagan and Bowser had
a prior professional
and financial
relationship that
was not disclosed to
the litigants as
required by the code
of ethics. And as a
matter of fact it
was kept covert
purposely by Bowser
and Kagan. And, when
that relationship
was uncovered Kagan
was confronted with
the evidence and had
no choice but to
recuse in disgrace.
And the Master
report was thrown
out as a result of
this discovery. It
seems "Special
Master" jobs are
used to funnel
favors and money to
friends of judges
and ex-judges often
in probate court.
This system is all
about extracting as
much money for the
players in it from
couple in crisis.
Rule of thumb for
lawyers is keep
CAUSING problems
until 40% of the
estate's value is
billed in legal
fees. In this case,
even with
a win on appeal, the
victim is further
abused financially by additional
onerous legal fees.
So even when you win
and the judges make
HUGE errors you pay
he price all over
again and the
industry players get
to bill more. In
most industries this
is called "fraud".
They make mistakes
on purpose and bill
you more??! The divorce industry
is a SCAM for
lawyers to plunder
the estates of
divorcing couple
using children as
bait! These people
have no soul or
ethics and are
destroying families
and children for
their own profit and
greed.
From Another
victim of Kagan:
Spencer M. Kagan:
Politically and
organized crime
connected &
protected: 5 years
on the bench, (appointed
by Cellucci, lied
on his original
application to become
a judge).
Has 31 recorded
cases with the appellate
court, more than
any other judge
in the state of
MA. the go
to guy, currently in
Middlesex, 3rd district,
along with Rockett
& Kaplan (protect
each other) to
dump more money
back into the (illegal)
"Law"
community @ a huge
cost to families.
Total dollar asset
figure is the
driving force.
Case specifics:
31 year marriage,
20/80 division on
marital assets.
Kagan ignored
Financial statements,
Trust, Court Ordered
Discovery, Reconciliation,
Master, his own
court orders. Forced
to a 2 day trial,
kicks the main verification
witness out of the
court room w/out
explanation, contempt's,
and his famous Restraining
order issued to
induce "fear"
so he won't be exposed.
On May 25th 2005
Spencer Kagan rescued
from my case, admitting
that he was not
able to do his job!!!
Why? One of
his own, prominent
Boston attorney,
connected friend (case
manager) from Brown
& Rudnick came
forward, wanted
to be granted immunity,
give a sworn deposition,
and expose all.
Not allowed, professional
suicide. Stipulation
of the parties,
stipulated evidence
(only signed by
ONE attorney, not
the parties or other
attorney, and
allowed) totally
illegal, why?
Discovery: court
ordered never done,
why this is the
"LAW"?
In
Spencer Kagan's
own words (taped
x2) "Donald
Trumps, Art of the
DEAL"!
Refuse to take the
DEAL, you can pay
in the appellate
process. Logic
& the basic
concept of mathematics
is not part of the
equation, instead
the Judge uses
his position and
personal connections,
to dump more money
back into the
corrupt legal system,
void of all conscience. Under
the "pains
and penalty of the
law" in place
for all.
Anonymous lawyer quoted
about Kagan: "a
pompous ass"
Judge Spencer M. Kagan,
Cambridge family Probate
Court.
Judge Kagan has ignored
my evidence of Attorney
Charles Jordan lying
to Judge Kagan as
I had Photographic
Proof. Judge
Kagan has ignored
taped Recordings of
another Judge Rocket
, that Heard the evidence
and Proof that my
spouse lies on ALL
of his Financial Statements
as to the high amount
of his income. Judge
Kagan cancelled 2
of my court days due
to his Mother's illness
and the cancelled
another
Trial Day due to one
of the Attorneys brother's
illness, dragging
our case on over 3.5
yrs. Judge Kagan
showed unethical favoritism
towards one of his
Lawyer Friends opinions,
not factual information
of Attorney Fern Frolin
from Wellsley whom
is good friends with
Judge Spencer Kagan
and she misrepresented
and lied about my
child's True wishes
to live with mom,
( Per my daughter's
own words).
Judge Kagan also ignored
my pictorial evidence
that Attny. Fern Frolin
had misrepresented
factual facts to our
Guardian Et Litem
assigned resulting
in G.A.L.' s report
containing unfactual
and untruths
which Judge Kagan
leaned towards to
believing without
seeing my evidence.
The G.A.L.'s
Three reports,
all contradicted each
other greatly.
Judge Kagan also ignored
listening to two professional
witnesses that were
ready to present evidence
on this day 3-22-06
including our DSS
Social Worker and
our Families 4 year
family therapist Dr.
Anne Gehren-Beck Shim
from Wediko Childrens'
Services and "forced"
us, the parents to
sign a 6 page agreement,
conjured up by my
children's attorneys
just to put an end
our case even after
all his cancellations
of Trial days and
refusals to listen
to Professional Collateral
Witnesses Present
that day. Not
listening to the Taped
Recording of Judge
Rocket's statement
"What dos this
say about this man's
creditability"
when my spouse was
Caught by Judge Rocket
lying on all his Financial
Statements was very
detrimental to the
ending result of our
custody case as well
as refusal to listen
to Professional Colateral
Witness's statements
resulted in Poor Decision
Making by Judge Kagan
putting my young children's
health, well being
and best interest
of my children at
High Risk for Danger
in father's house
where witness testified
that loaded handgun
was found by her and
also father had bought
& supplied liquor
to minors in his home
from my daughter,
age 14 to other teens
under age 18.
His actions up until
now have been a complete
disgrace and the safety
of my female children
are now at high Risk
of danger.
The one attorney,
Attorney Fern Frolin,
will be reported to
the BAR Assoc.
I am very disappointed
in the Unethical Behavior
& Friendly relationship
he has
(outside of the court)
with one of the female
Attorneys that represented
my youngest child.
Now, my youngest child
is placed in the house
with the Loaded Gun,
Other Weapons, Alcohol
bought & served
to minors, exposure
to Child Pornography,
My 15 year old getting
pregnant in father's
home from daily sex
as the children are
completely unsupervised
there, etc.
If My children get
Hurt at father's due
to these
unsafe factors Judge
Kagan ignored, further
action will be taken
|
Judge
Jonathan Kaplan,
Rockville Court, Connecticut |
Chris Kennedy
Ellington, CT 06029
860-871-8538(H) |
At Rockville Court,
with Jonathan
Kaplan as administrator, the
rules of civil procedure
no longer apply,
Criminal proceedings
are ignored and
children are being
abused.
Criminal court
orders stay in effect
after defendants
are found not guilty,
mothers are no longer
required to attend
family court proceedings or
hearings,
Practice book requirements
for service and
representation are
overruled.
The Practice
Book for Civil Proceedures
requires a person
to be notified of
a civil proceeding
and service by mail.
At Rockville, parties
are now required
to subpoena the
other party.
Parties also
have the right to
council on motions
for contempt.
Not at Rockville,
you have no rights
and parents are
forced to represent
themselves and are
incarcerated.
Hearings are
held without the
mothers being required
to show and the
motions are denied.
When a father fails
to show a capias
is issued for their
arrest.
Motions filed
by men are delayed
for months, motions
by mothers are scheduled
in days, short cicuiting
the normal procedures
Blank Restraining
orders are issued
with no allegations
of abuse and granted
for complaints against
Judges.
Kaplan can
fabricate documents
and influence other
jurisdictions for
arrests and prosecutions.
|
| Judge
Ronald King, Worcester,
Marlboro and Leominster |
|
Over
22 violations of the
law in my case alone
that I have seen and
documented. I will
likely file federal
suit for "acting
in his own person",
abuse of power and
many civil rights
violations.
Regularly issues restraining
orders to anyone for
the asking without
meeting the legal
requirements of statutes
and case law (this
seems to have become
standard procedure
of all the lower courts,
who ignore the rights
of men and case law
limiting this issuance
of these to cases
of "reasonable
fear, which would
not be reasonable
without prior violent
acts or threats of
bodily harm to an
individual).
Issues child support
orders without any
basis in fact, evidence
or even testimony
that have nothing
to do with the income
of the father. Does
not fill out the child
support guidelines
worksheets, as required
by state law, just
picks round numbers
out of the air while
ignoring medical payments
and other required
adjustments.
Makes support orders
in violation of federal
law by exceeding 60%
of take-home pay of
fathers. Finds
people in contempt
of court and sentences
them to jail terms
totally against cited
case law, requiring
proof that the defendant
has the ability to
pay at the time of
the contempt hearing,
when they have no
ability to pay the
impossible and unlawful
orders he has previously
placed them under.
Puts
people in job programs
when they already
have a job to try
to force them to earn
more money against
constitutional rights.
Has obvious prejudice
against self-employed
individuals and shows
this by his remarks
in open court.
Denies fathers access
to their children
without any basis
in law, fact or testimony,
doing great harm to
children and their
relationship with
their father.
Makes
inappropriate threats
and comments to intimidate
defendant fathers
like "one more
word and you will
go to jail" to
end hearing when he
is not getting what
he wants and is being
presented with his
violations of the
law and due process.
Constantly terminate
hearings prematurely
when he think he has
heard enough, though
you have additional
testimony and evidence
to present.
Violates due process
constantly by ending
hearings prematurely
for lunch or the next
case right in the
middle of a persons
arguments (actually
got up and left for
lunch one time when
my lawyer was still
talking. We were only
50% through a set
of motions before
the court) which much
evidence prepared
to present.
Refuses to provide
findings of facts
within the 60 days
required by federal
law (even after allowing
the motion). Denies
valid motions and
requests showing great
prejudice against
men, pro se defendants
(men) and self-employed
individuals. Seems
to believe if you
are self-employed
you must be a criminal
and can pay yourself
any amount you wish
magically. Seems
to believe anyone
who fights for their
rights should be intimated,
threatened with jail
and ruined financially
until they comply
with his beliefs and
wishes. Ignores
due process and the
constitutional rights
of men.
Shows either great
arrogance or ignorance
of the laws (hard
to tell really) through
his actions and comments.
As
with most judges in
the Massachusetts
family court system,
judge King inflicts
cruel and unusual
punishment on fathers
by kidnapping their
children to impose
the ransom of child
support for the for-profit
system that has formed
around the $25 billion
per year divorce industry.
The conflict of interest
from unconstitutional
federal government
kickbacks of HUNDREDS
of MILLION of dollars
to the judicial system
is a violation of
the judges oath around
conflicts of interest
and the oath to uphold
the country's highest
laws, over those of
the state, which are
the constitution and
the U.S. Supreme courts.
Massachusetts and
many states court
act in very clear
violation of this
higher law every day. |
|
Judge Sacks |
|
The Dishonorable
Judge Sacks is
still on the
prowl.
Today was my one
year anniversary
of my RO to have
it vacated.
As per usual
Sacks v Schebel,
Sacks failed to
follow law but
followed his
protocol.
In the hearing
my lovely
ex-pride stated
in the past year
there has been
NO new
incidences but I
feel the
restraining
order works well
in this case and
it should be
continued.
I crossed
examined her and
in that cross
examination she
has admitted she
filed criminal
complaints just
because my name
came up on
caller ID (my
son called her),
and that I was
found INNOCENT
of the charges.
Even after I
told
dishonorable
Sacks about
Dolan v Dolan 55
Mass. App. Ct.
905, 771 N.E.2d
825
and Jones
v. Gallagher 54
Mass. App. Ct.
883, 768 N.E.2d
1088, the
dishonorable
Sacks stated I
misunderstood
the case and no
new incidence
need occur.
He wrote
"Plaintiff has
reasonable cause
for order to be
extended the
continued need
based on the
testimony and
case history and
prior finding.
Deft is
incorrect that a
"New" incident
is required.
So here I go to
the appeals
court again
after the
election again.
|
|
Judge Judith Dilday
(Middlesex Probate &
Family Court, Cambridge
MA) |
JNollet@worldnet.att.net |
One would suppose
that, as an African-American,
she of all judges
would be properly
sensitive to the possibility
of false accusation
and unjust persecution
established government.
Moreover, her own
husband, James Dilday,
a noted attorney in his
own right, was once
publicly and falsely(?)
accused by a former
client of having molested
her. But do
not expect Justice
from this judge --
not if you're a male.
She will grant Restraining
Orders like candy
if the requester is
female but will ignore
similar pleases from
men even in the face
of witnesses and vast
physical evidence.
She once issued an
RO against me simply
because my ex asked
for it. In the
afternoon session,
I asked for a reciprocal
RO against her.
She said, "I
don't do that." (But
why not? Nothing
in the law prevents
that, and a doubly-binding
order could only further
insure the Peace,
no?) She referred
to my documentation
as so much "pounds
of paper."
(But most if not all
evidence introduced
in any court is so
much "paper;"
courts could not function
by refusing to admit
paper evidence.)
She simply refused
to do her job.
This is sexist and
unacceptable behavior
from a judge, granting
and order against
the requirements
for women alone
is unlawful, not
granting the same
for a man is sexist
also and a separate
offense. |
Judge
Peter C. Digangi
Essex County |
kmtinma@comcast.net |
In
one case alone:
(1) Judge Digangi
made numerous findings
of fact that are completely
unsupported or uncorroborated
by the evidence;
(2) he precluded me
from presenting every
one of my 55 exhibits
that I had pre-marked
for the trial;
(3) he ignored the
mother's blatant crimes
of perjury in legal
documents, lies under
oath, and contempt
of court orders;
(4) he disregarded
my Constitutionally-guaranteed
rights to due process
and equal protection
and my inalienable
right to parent my
child;
(5) he overestimated
the evidential value
of secondhand hearsay;
(6) he fabricated
evidence of his own
to slander me;
(7) he misdirected
me during the trial
to obstruct the submission
of evidence that would
have damaged the mother's
case;
(8) he entered orders
on issues outside
of his jurisdiction
that were not even
brought up during
the trial;
(9) and he expressed
his gender biased
opinion on several
occasions that fathers
are lesser parents
than mothers and have
no chance of success
in his courtroom.
This case went to
appeals court because
of Judge Digangi.
A competent court
would have reviewed
the evidence and been
able to assess the
credibility of the
Mother from that evidence,
and an honorable court
would have held the
Mother accountable
long before my case
made it to appeals
court.
| |