| Tammy wrote: "Male
or female the NCP gets the pain, suffering,
stigma, and injustice."...Jeffrey
wrote: "Yes, and it so happens
to be that the NCP is almost always
the male, so "as a rule"
it is blatant gender-bias originated
with the "losers" being
primarily the children and fathers
- and sometimes the "exception"
of mothers."
Jeffery,
If this is what you believe you are
not going to be happy with my documentary.
I discovered a FINANCIAL scam that
is the root of all these problems.
It was never is not now a gender issue
when it comes to the courts ruling.
What it is, is profiteering.
The women's groups have gone long
unopposed when they present new legislation
and while researching some 480 laws
that have been presented in California
by those groups, it is interesting
to note that some of the worst laws
for families and children that got
passes, were opposed by the Judges
and Family Law BAR. They still
passed because there was no one to
lobby against them so they flew under
the radar of the public and just got
pushed through. Those groups
are playing the gender card for their
own benefit.
BUT, when you say the courts are making
rulings based on a gender bias, you
miss the bigger picture. The
rulings they make are according to
procedures that ensure the largest
reimbursement of inflated expenses,
or in bonus grants from VAWA (as every
case with false allegations, even
proven false, becomes a DV Divorce
case). It's only about the
money. They have no trouble
giving the husband custody and awarding
99% of the community property to the
husband if there is an arrangement
in place that gets them more money
(and it is rare, but I do have documentation
that it has happened in high net worth
cases here in CA).
So my point is this. If you
keep pulling the gender card, or claiming
gender bias, your words are going
to be dismissed by those listening.
This is America, the land where no
man is a victim and no woman is an
abuser. You simply will NEVER
win with that argument.
Now, reframe that argument to say
that the courts make decisions based
on their profit margin, not on the
individual facts of the case and what
do you have? A provable, fact
driven argument, that will piss off
the voters. :) You choose which
argument you want to make. But
so long as the battle is seen as between
the sexes, it is doomed to fail.
_____________________________________________________
Adryenn Ashley
adryenn_ashley@yahoo.com
PMB 304, 925 Lakeville Highway, Petaluma,
CA 94952
|