| I
won't publish this feminist propaganda
on this web site - it is abusive,
silly and not based in facts, statistics
or anything scientific. These stories
are rare and used over and over again.
Talk to ANY man who has been through
this process and you will find a story
of bias, illegal actions by courts
and unconstitutional ruling - in VIRTUALLY
EVERY CASE! These feminist stories
are just that, stories, maybe blown
out of proportion and some not I am
sure, but certainly not the average
case, and certainly not a basis to
support the HUGE bias in the courts
that exists OR change the law or remove
more constitutional rights from fathers
and men. I am disgusted by the
self-interest of these people that
knows no bounds and will take away
every right of a man so as to have
some some benefit for women. The time
for change has come and is very near.
It is time men created a balancing
power for NOW and other groups that
are out of control, biased one way
and have no sense of fairness whatsoever. |
| Dear Editor,
Thanks for Cynthia Tucker's opinion
in the Atlanta Journal Constitution
on the nature of fathers in America
circa 2005. Many societal changes
have occurred in the last 200 years
overcoming racial, religious and sexual
biases. Imagine, blacks were lynched,
homosexuals thought psychotic, and
wives and children in the USA were
considered property just 100 years
ago. The individual and groups' rights
movements have changed many things
for the better.
However, Cynthia Tucker's opinions
of "angry, selfish noncustodial
father ...centered on their needs,
their wants, their frayed cuffs, worn
soles and tiny black-and-white TVs"
do nothing to advance the "best
interests of children" as individuals
and a group and reflect the current
sexual bias toward dads in the family
court system and perhaps in current
society as well.
With her broad stereotyping, Cynthia
Tucker even mirrors earlier opinions
of women in the workplace:
"Imagine an article stating,
for example, that 'mothers are far
less qualified to work in professional
positions than fathers. They take
off more time to have and care for
children, and suffer from a lack of
business acumen due to the fact that
they are more emotional and prone
to hysteria.' Such writing would rightfully
be labeled as inflammatory, stereotypical,
gender-based discrimination. Our culture
currently condones a double standard
when it comes to evaluating female/male
attributes: it is acceptable to communicate
generalized, discriminatory comments
about men, but in turn it is unacceptable
- and in some cases downright illegal-
to communicate discriminatory comments
toward women." (source, Cynthia
McNeely "Lagging Behind the Times:
Parenthood, Custody, and Gender Bias
in the Family Court", 1998 Florida
State University Law Review).
Georgia HB221 does not hold Dads unaccountable
but in fact holds both divorced parents
accountable: There is no longer a
presumption of a super-parent
(custodial) and under-parent (non-custodial)
with regard to their children. Both
are equal, leading to balance in their
children as close as possible to an
intact-home.
George Mason
Non-custodial citizen Dad with a color-TV,
good soul (although my shoes do need
polishing), who wants and needs his
kids and whose kids want and need
their father.
Holden, MA
508.735.6615
http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/011/991nmrow.asp
** *"Another troubling new issue
is Title IV-D of the Social Security
Act, the federal government's child
support collection and enforcement
program. Originally designed to track
down the welfare fathers of illegitimate
children, the measure has increasingly
targeted middle income households
affected by divorce. There is mounting
evidence that the system now encourages
marital breakup and exacerbates fatherlessness
by creating a winner-take-all game,
where the losing parent--commonly
a father wanting to save the marriage--is
unfairly penalized by the loss of
his children and by a federally enforced
child support obligation. Here we
find objectively false feminist views--the
assumption that men are always the
abusers and women are always the victims--driving
public policy. And here we find still
another newly indentured class of
citizens--noncustodial parents--being
squeezed financially by the state.
If you think this an exaggeration,
I refer you to no less an authority
than Phyllis Schlafly, who calls this
runaway federal law the most serious
danger facing American families today."
* |
