|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ACFC
Issues New Report: Family Violence in
America, PBS Campaign in 300 Newspapers |
|
May
16, 2006 |
|
Our
PBS Campaign, Parental Alienation
Syndrome Discussed in 300+
Newspapers
Syndicated columnist Kathleen
Parker, whose columns appear
in over 300 newspapers,
discusses our
Campaign Against PBS's Father-Bashing
Breaking the Silence
in her new column on
Parental Alienation Syndrome--Let's
not alienate parents in
custody battles.
Parental Alienation Syndrome
is when one parent--usually
the custodial parent--tries
to poison his or her children's
minds and turn the children
against the noncustodial
parent. Parker describes
Parental Alienation Syndrome
as "agony for a noncustodial
parent and emotional problems
for children alienated from
one parent," and commends
a recent proclamation signed
by Maine's Governor John
E. Baldacci that recognizes
April 25 as "Parental
Alienation Awareness Day."
In my column
PBS Declares War on Dads
(World Net Daily, 10/20/05)
I described in detail numerous
examples of PAS. One of
them, experienced by one
of my readers, is as follows: |
|
Advertise
on the World's Largest Regularly
Distributed E-Newsletter on
Men's and Fathers' Issues
Are you looking for an
affordable way to reach tens
of thousands of people with
your business, organization
or message? My weekly E-Newsletter
is the largest regularly distributed
men's and fathers' issues
E-Newsletter in the world.
Contact us for more information.
|
"After
Jim L.'s wife divorced him
and moved his daughters out
of state, she sent the two
girls fake or altered e-mails
purporting to be Jim. Afterwards,
Jim's daughters refused to
see him, explaining only 'you
know what you've done, you
know what you said, you know
what you wrote.'
"Once when Jim flew to
see his girls for his scheduled
weekend visit, his ex-wife
decided at the last minute
to block the visit. Jim flew
home on Sunday without having
seen his girls. When he arrived
at the airport back home he
checked his messages and found
a message from his ex-wife.
On the recording his girls
could be heard crying in the
background. His ex-wife said:
"'Jim, the girls are
here at the restaurant waiting
for you to come pick them
up. You said you'd meet them
here for breakfast and spend
the day with them, and you
didn't show up. The girls
are very upset. Jim, where
are you?!?'"
Parker also wrote:
"Fathers
who feel disenfranchised when
courts award custody of their
children to the mother during
divorce have used PAS successfully
to pressure judges to allow
greater access to their children.
One can hardly blame men for
trying to be fathers.
"But critics claim that
abusive fathers sometimes
use PAS to force access where
none should be granted. Mothers
claim in such cases that they're
trying to protect their children,
not alienate them.
"This
latter argument became the
centerpiece last fall of a
controversial PBS documentary
about abused women and children,
'Breaking the Silence,' that
fathers' groups attacked as
unbalanced and unfair.
"No fathers were interviewed,
and the cases reviewed tended
to be extreme and sensational.
"Several women interviewed,
for instance, said that they
lost custody of their children
to abusive fathers (confirmed
by the children themselves)
when fathers used PAS to 'prove'
that the women were systematically
teaching their children to
hate their fathers.
"Glenn Sacks, a radio
show host and columnist, called
the film a 'direct assault
on fatherhood,' and organized
a protest on his Web site.
Others - many of whom I know
and respect as fellow toilers
in trying to advance fatherhood
- joined in.
"Sacks' campaign had
an effect, and PBS ombudsman
Michael Getler wrote a lengthy
response agreeing that the
show was unbalanced."
As we've
noted, in the end PBS agreed
to commission a new film to
examine the issues raised
by the film and our campaign
in a more balanced, detailed
light. To learn more, click
here. The groups to which
Parker refers when she writes
"fellow toilers in trying
to advance fatherhood"
include
Fathers and Families,
the
American Coalition for Fathers
& Children, and
Help Stop PAS Inc.
As for Parker's
comment that "Several
women interviewed, for instance,
said that they lost custody
of their children to abusive
fathers (confirmed by the
children themselves)"
this "confirmation"
is dubious in several cases.
We revealed court findings,
records and testimony show
that Sadia Loeliger--portrayed
as a heroic mom in the film--abused
children under her care. In
fact, a Tulare County Juvenile
Court concluded in August
of 1998 that Sadia Loeliger
had committed multiple acts
of abuse, and adjudged both
her daughters as dependents
of the Juvenile Court. To
learn more, click
here.
Parker concludes:
"The
biggest losers in such cases,
of course, are neither the
mothers nor the fathers, but
the children, who deserve
to have unfettered access
to both parents, assuming
there's no abuse, without
having to tote the adults'
emotional baggage.
"Whether parental alienation
meets the scientific standards
of a 'syndrome' is a battle
researchers can wage among
themselves. The underlying
message, meanwhile, is that
there needs to be a presumption
of shared custody following
divorce, again, assuming no
abuse.
"Life is alienating enough
without the help of one's
own parents."
Agreed. |
Parenting Plan Calendar Software
Shared Ground (R) is an
easy-to-use custody calendar
software program designed
for divorced families to track
visitation schedules. Includes
a built-in percentage calculator,
schedule templates, free training
and excellent customer assistance.
Parents, attorneys, arbitrators
and mediators can generate
equitable parenting plans,
which is especially useful
for parents seeking fair division
of their children's time.
FREE TRIAL SOFTWARE AVAILABLE
by clicking
here. |
ACFC
Issues New Report: Family
Violence in America: The Truth
about Domestic Violence and
Child Abuse
The American
Coalition for Fathers and
Children has just issued a
new report,
Family Violence in America:
The Truth about Domestic Violence
and Child Abuse, which
explains the many ways the
war on domestic violence has
separated children from the
fathers they love and need,
and has led to "by far
the most severe and alarming
violation of constitutional
freedoms in the United States
today."
The report,
penned by ACFC President
Stephen Baskerville, PhD.,
concludes that family dissolution
is creating child abuse, and
that child custody disputes
are a large factor both in
fabricated accusations of
domestic violence and actual
incidents. According to the
report:
"The
public and policymakers have
been seriously misled [about
domestic violence]. Gaping
inconsistencies separate what
the scientific data demonstrate
about family violence from
current public policy. When
the scientific knowledge of
these problems is understood,
it becomes clear that current
policy is not likely to alleviate
these problems. More disturbingly,
by destabilizing families
it is likely to be contributing
to them...
"To
break this circle, we call
for a radical departure from
existing programs and offer
the following recommendations:
"Government must adhere
to the Bill of Rights and
other constitutional protections.
"Reform constitutionally
questionable programs, such
as the Violence Against Women
Act, that politicize and distort
law enforcement and target
individuals because of their
membership in groups or their
political beliefs rather than
their deeds.
"Statutory protection
for parental rights to ensure
that law enforcement programs
are not commandeered to create
unaccountable police actions
against innocent parents,
depriving them of their children
without due process of law.
"A legal presumption
of equal and shared legal
and physical custody of children
in cases of divorce, separation,
and unmarried parents. By
strengthening families and
the bonds between parents
and their children, we will
be addressing the roots of
family violence, including
child abuse."
To read the 72 page report,
click
here. To contact the ACFC
about the report, write to
info@acfc.org or call 800-978-DADS
(3237). |
Leving's
Divorce Magazine
The second edition of
Leving's Divorce Magazine,
the new magazine for the modern
divorced men, is now available
online with articles focusing
on issues such as men's reproductive
rights (or lack thereof),
Parental Alienation Syndrome
and child support. Visit now
and get a free subscription.
Help, Resources for Dads
The
National Fathers' Resource
Center is a division of
Fathers For Equal Rights,
Inc. (FER), located in
Dallas, Texas, with offices
in both Dallas and Houston.
In existence for over three
decades, it has services and
resources for dads nationwide
and is one of the largest
and most active fathers' rights
organizations in the U.S.
www.fathers4kids.org |
Dr.
Phil Trashes Dads--Again
Popular daytime
TV host Dr. Phil is father-bashing
again. In the past I've criticized
Dr. Phil for supporting and
whitewashing abusive mother
Bridget Marks, who was found
by five separate judges to
have coached her little girls
to believe that they had been
sexually molested by their
father.
Marks became
a cause celebre after
(briefly) losing custody of
her twin girls to their father,
against whom she had waged
a vicious parental alienation
campaign. Marks had appeared
on Dr. Phil during the custody
battle, and Dr. Phil held
a joyous reunion with her
on the air in May of last
year to celebrate her victory
in the custody battle.
The father's
side spoke for the first time
publicly on
His Side with Glenn Sacks--to
listen or to read a transcript
of the that show, go to
Father's Side in Bridget Marks
Custody Case Speaks Publicly
for First Time, 4/5/05.
Several New York newspapers
quoted from our show in their
news articles.
To
learn more about the Marks
case, including Marks' legal
team taunting me over their
court victory, Marks' unkind
comments for me, and my newspaper
columns on the Marks case,
see
Bridget Marks Ruling: It's
OK to Coach Little Girls Into
Saying They'd Been Molested
(4/7/05)
Now Dr. Phil
is again on the warpath against
dads, pushing the discredited
"lazy husband" myth.
The promo for one of his shows
this week is called
The Divorce Experiment
and reads:
"Are
you married to a man who doesn't
know how good he has it? You
do the cooking, the cleaning,
take care of the kids, and
he still takes you for granted?
After seven years, Amy finds
herself in a marriage where
she is expected to wait on
her husband hand and foot,
and never voice her opinion.
Her husband, Greg, is a self-proclaimed
male chauvinist pig and says
his wife's job is to take
care of the family without
questioning his role as 'king'
of the house. Amy says if
Greg doesn't learn to treat
her like his equal and not
his servant, she's going to
divorce him. Dr. Phil sends
in a Relationship Rescue team
of strong women to teach Greg
a lesson! While Amy is sent
off on a special trip to build
her self-esteem, Greg gets
three new 'wives' who give
him a dose of his own medicine
as they put him through all
that he demands of his wife
on a daily basis. Will he
finally see Amy as his equal
and become a better spouse
in the process?"
While it's
certainly possible to find
lazy husbands (and lazy wives),
as I've noted in many columns
and on the radio, the idea
that husbands don't do their
share or that "women
work two jobs, men only work
one" is a complete myth.
In my co-authored column
Are American Husbands Slackers?
( Tallahassee Democrat,
3/22/06) family law attorney
Jeff Leving and I wrote:
"Feminist
critics compare the work men
and women do at home but fail
to properly account for their
disparate obligations outside
the home. Census data shows
that only 40% of married women
with children under 18 work
full-time, and over a quarter
do not hold a job outside
the home.
"According
to the Bureau of Labor Statistics'
2004 Time Use Survey, men
spend one and a half times
as many hours working as women
do, and full-time employed
men still work significantly
more hours than full-time
employed women.
"When
both work outside the home
and inside the home are properly
considered, it is clear that
men do at least as much as
women. A 2002 University of
Michigan Institute for Social
Research survey found that
women do 11 more hours of
housework a week than men
but men work 14 hours a week
more than women. According
to the BLS, men's total time
at leisure, sleeping, doing
personal care activities,
or socializing is a statistically
meaningless 1% higher than
women's. The Families and
Work Institute in New York
City found that fathers now
provide three-fourths as much
child care as mothers do--50%
more than 30 years ago."
We also noted
that men do the most dangerous
and demanding jobs, and that
men are vastly more likely
than women to be killed or
injured on the job. We wrote
of the "sacrifices
made by men like Terry Helms,
one of the 12 miners killed
in the Sago Mine disaster
[in January]...Terry's son
Nick told the Associated Press
that his father 'had endured
numerous injuries in a 30-year
career and hated mining because
of the dangers'..'[My father]
is very selfless,' Nick said.
'[He] refused to quit because
the job put food on the table...He
gave his life in there so
I could go to the movies.'" |
The
Second Wives Club
The Second Wives Club is what
women in blended families
are looking for: Remarriage,
divorce, child custody, and
step parenting discussed in
a solution-oriented, mature,
and intelligent way; articles
and news written by thought-provoking
experts and journalists; personal
accounts and advice from some
of life's most interesting
women.
www.SecondWivesClub.com
Help for Boston Dads
Boston family law attorney
Nick Palermo is a shared custody
advocate who believes that
divorced dads are parents,
not visitors. The Law Offices
of Nicholas Palermo is a dedicated
and committed trial law firm
which has worked to make shared
custody for all fit parents
the law of the land.
LAW OFFICES OF NICHOLAS PALERMO |
Another
Rich, High-Living Deadbeat
Goes to Jail (aka Another
Low Income Dad Goes to Debtors'
Prison)
From the
Akron Beacon Journal
article
Dad who escaped procreation
ban jailed on child support
charges (make sure to
check out the next to last
paragraph):
"A judge
who was forced to lift his
probation condition that a
deadbeat dad not father more
children has sentenced the
man to six months in jail
for continuing to fail to
pay child support.
"Sean Talty, 34, of Akron,
pleaded guilty on Friday to
violating terms of his five-year
probation by failing to stay
current on the payments.
"Medina County Common
Pleas Judge James Kimbler,
who sentenced Talty to probation
in 2002 and modified the terms
under Ohio Supreme Court order
in 2004, said Talty can reduce
the sentence through community
service.
"Talty has fathered seven
children by five women and
also owes support in Butler,
Summit and Wayne Counties.
The Medina County case involves
$30,000 he owes for three
of the children by two of
the women, including a former
wife.
"Court records show the
probation violations involve
$3,600 owed for 2005 and this
year and failure to get a
high school equivalency degree.
"In 2004, Kimbler lifted
one of his probation conditions
imposed in 2002, that Talty
not father any more children
while on probation. The Ohio
Supreme Court had ruled the
sentence was overbroad because
it didn't include a method
for lifting the ban if Talty
caught up with his payments."
A few thoughts:
1) Obviously
Talty's no model citizen.
However, you're not supposed
to be imprisoned for debt
in this country--debtors prisons
were abolished a long time
ago. Talty is being jailed
because of failure to pay
child support, but nobody
questions whether his child
support was commensurate with
his income. This is a guy
who can't even get a high
school GED--it's doubtful
he earns or could earn enough
to pay the obligation he's
being imprisoned for.
2)
Why are the five women who
bore Talty's children held
blameless? All of these women
did exactly what Talty did‑‑they
had children whom they could
not financially support. In
fact, given the much wider
range of birth control and
reproductive choices that
women have, these women had
a much larger say in the decision
to have children than Oakley
did. Low income mothers get
sympathy and assistance--fathers
get blame and jail.
3)
I've checked the top 10 most
wanted deadbeat parents lists
put out by the states on many
different occasions, usually
in preparation for an article
on the war against so-called
"deadbeat dads."
In my co-authored column
Federal Child Support Enforcement
Cuts Will Hurt Bureaucrats,
not Children (Las Vegas
Review-Journal, 12/17/05,
Riverside Press-Enterprise,
12/16/05) family law attorney
Jeff Leving and I wrote:
"In
the past few months, 'deadbeat
parents' have been the targets
of highly-publicized law enforcement
actions in Virginia, Texas,
Kentucky, and Arizona. Yet
Virginia's 'Most Wanted Deadbeat
Parents' list is topped by
a laborer, a carnival hired
hand, and a construction worker,
who collectively somehow owe
over a quarter million dollars
in child support. Of all the
parents on Texas' and Kentucky's
lists, only one appears to
have an education, and the
most common designation for
occupation is 'laborer.' Near
the top of Arizona's list
is a maintenance man who owes
$90,223, an unemployed man
of no known occupation who
owes $54,298, and, best of
all, a roofer who owes $240,581.
"This
week Texas Attorney General
Greg Abbott boasted that he
had arrested one of the 'deadbeats'
on his 'Most Wanted' list--Charles
Silva, who owes almost $40,000
in child support. Yet it's
doubtful that Silva will be
writing a five figure check
any time soon--Silva's occupation
is 'general laborer.'
Far from being lists of well-heeled
businessmen, lawyers, and
accountants, the vast majority
of the men on these lists
do low wage and often seasonal
work, and owe large sums of
money which they could never
hope to pay off.
"Child
support enforcement agencies
are notorious for their abusive
tactics towards such men..." |
Finding
Your N.U.T.s.--Non-negotiable
Unalterable Terms
Wayne M. Levine, M.A.,
founder of BetterMen(R), has
written a new book with sage
advice and proven tools for
men who want to be BetterMen(R)
in their relationships and
in their lives. Finding Your
N.U.T.s offers men the truth
about themselves, their relationships,
their responsibilities as
men, and the power they have
to be BetterMen(R).
www.bettermen.org |
|
Speaking
of the Boy Crisis in Education
(Part I)
Just after
the publication of my co-authored
column
Resolving the Boy Crisis in
Schools (Chicago Sun-Times,
5/7/06) last week I was given
another reminder of it in
my son's life. My son's Boy
Scout troop had planned to
participate in a big, week
long Boy Scout campout in
August. The trip sounded fantastic--a
week up in the mountains in
Northern California with all
sorts of fun activities--hiking,
archery, boating, etc. Except
it turns out that the troop
won't be going. The reason?
Most of the boys couldn't
sign up, because they were
all in danger of having to
go to summer school. Somehow
I doubt that many Girl Scout
summer trips are being cancelled
for that reason...
In the column
Resolving the Boy Crisis in
Schools (Chicago Sun-Times,
5/7/06), we discussed
a recent Chicago Board of
Education report which showed
that girls enjoy a 63-37%
advantage over boys in gaining
admittance to Chicago's eight
selective-enrollment college
prep high schools. Family
law attorney Jeff Leving and
I wrote:
"In
response, Chicago Public Schools
CEO Arne Duncan and top administrators
at Jones, Whitney Young and
Brooks prep schools are advocating
that schools consider 'gender
weighting.' Yet to balance
the scales by employing admissions
preferences is misguided.
What's needed instead is a
rethinking of the way we educate,
beginning at the earliest
levels.
"Many
healthy, energetic, intelligent
boys are branded as behavior
problems as soon as they begin
school, and are punished and
put on Ritalin or other drugs
so they will sit still. Little
thought is given to two obvious
questions: how could a six
or seven year-old be 'bad'?
And how could so many boys
need drugs to function in
school? Because schools and
classrooms do not fit their
educational needs, many boys
disengage from school long
before they ever reach the
prep school level.
"Many
modern educational practices
are counterproductive for
boys. Success in school is
tightly correlated with the
ability to sit still, be quiet
and complete paperwork and
assignments which are sometimes
of questionable value. A 'get
tough' mentality--under which
teachers give excessive homework
lest they appear uncommitted
or weak--has become a substitute
for educators actually having
a sound reason for assigning
all the work they assign."
We
also discussed one of my pet
peeves--the way our schools
(and our society) devalue
and disregard the talents
and contributions of men who
work with their hands. We
wrote:
"The
deterioration of vocational
education also hurts boys.
US Department of Education
data show that these programs
suffered a sharp decline from
1982 to 1992 and never recovered.
Vocational classes once started
low and middle achieving boys
on the path to careers as
skilled tradesmen. They have
now often been replaced by
an asinine yet pervasive mantra
that defines as successful
only those who go to college
and become doctors or lawyers.
This mantra often disrespects
boys' blue collar fathers,
who also happen to be their
primary role models. In fact,
to suggest that a boy pursue
a career working with his
hands leaves a teacher open
to charges of harming students
by encouraging low expectations.
I've discussed
the boy crisis in education
in numerous newspaper columns
and on the radio. I don't
know how many times I've been
on a radio show and a caller
has said that his or her five
or six year-old boy is a "behavior
problem" or was "diagnosed
with ADD" and he or she
was agonizing over whether
or not to put him on Ritalin.
The boy crisis
was also the impetus behind
our highly-publicized
Campaign Against 'Boys are
Stupid' Products (12/14/03-3/1/04).
In seven weeks our campaign
drove T-shirts, hats, and
other merchandise bearing
the slogan "Boys are
Stupid--Throw Rocks at Them"
out of nearly 3,500 retail
outlets worldwide. In my column
Why I Launched the Campaign
Against 'Boys are Stupid'
Products (Los Angeles
Daily News, 2/4/04) I wrote:
"The
stores dropped the products
after being bombarded with
thousands of e-mails and phone
calls, largely from the listeners
and supporters of my radio
talk show. Most of those taking
action have been fathers who
are concerned about the cultural
atmosphere surrounding their
boys.
"However, some of the
most passionate and articulate
supporters of our campaign
have been the mothers and
grandmothers of boys. It is
mothers who generally supervise
their children's educations
on a day-to-day basis, and
they more than anybody see
boys' largely ignored struggles.
"Though our educational
establishment has been slow
to recognize it, boys have
fallen seriously behind girls
at all K-12 levels. Girls
get better grades than boys
and are far more likely to
graduate high school and go
to college. The vast majority
of learning-disabled students
are boys, as are students
diagnosed with attention-deficit
hyperactivity disorder. Nearly
nine million prescriptions
of Ritalin are written for
American children each year--most
of them for boys between the
ages of six and 12.
"Boys also suffer from
having few men in their lives.
Modern schools, particularly
at the elementary level, are
often devoid of men except
perhaps the janitor and the
maintenance crew. And there
are more boys growing up in
fatherless homes than ever
before.
"Add to all of these
problems a boy-bashing preteen
and teen culture--where clothing
which insults and taunts boys
is seen as acceptable and
'funny'--and it's natural
that many boys feel the deck
is stacked against them.
"As parents, we suffer
along with our children, and
like millions of mothers and
fathers, my wife and I have
lain awake in bed many nights
worrying about our son. Perhaps
this explains why the campaign
has struck such a chord--over
400 newspapers and television
and radio stations in seven
countries have carried stories
about it." |
Help
for Men Struggling with Relationships,
Depression, Anger or Anxiety
The Men's Center Los Angeles
offers individual, couple, family
and group counseling with a
focus on men's issues. Call
them at (818) 348-9302 or go
to
MensCenterLosAngeles.com |
|
Speaking
of the Boy Crisis in Education
(Part II)
Part I was
from my son's life, part II
is from my daughter's life.
My daughter's school recently
instituted a new after school
policy. Now instead of the
kids going out to the yard
to play, all students who
don't go home immediately
after school are corralled
into the lunch area to do
homework under supervision
for 30 minutes.
This is a
perfect example of the problems
inherent in our almost all-female
elementary school system.
The school means well, but
any group of male teachers
would know that after being
cooped up for almost eight
hours those boys need to go
out and run around. Instead,
after being forced to sit
all day--quite unnatural for
little boys--when the bell
rings they must be forced
marched over to yet another
half hour of sitting.
It also turns
into a chore for the supervising
teachers, who must stand guard
over the boys for a half hour.
No doubt many boys get punished
because they can't sit still
and do their homework after
school--as if they don't already
get punished enough during
the day for being unable to
sit still. I prefer the school
National Review Washington
Editor Kate O'Beirne describes
in
her latest book, where
the students work hard and
achieve, but also "have
recess twice a day, play in
the rain, wreck their good
shoes, and...they like school." |
Dad's
Time Tracker - Get More Time
With Your Children and Manage
Your Child Support
Dad's Time Tracker
helps divorced fathers collect
the information necessary
to get more parenting time,
lower their child support,
or gain custody of their children.
This guide walks fathers through
creating a child support payment
record and thorough tracking
of expenses made on behalf
of the children. Co-parenting
can be dramatically improved
when utilizing this tool because
key "friction" areas--expenses,
medical issues, contacts,
day care information, parenting
time--are addressed in advance.
www.dadstimetracker.com
Father: A Child's Right
Visit
www.fatherachildsright.org
to find information about
child custody issues related
to fathers and their children's
rights, as well as book reviews
on parenting, custody and
divorce. A fun and exciting
father & son baseball
component is added for
enjoyment. Buy books, magazines
and DVDs for your children.
Learn about the
Michigan Shared Parenting
bill.
www.fatherachildsright.org |
Hero
Dad Tells Story in Parents
Magazine
Heroic father
Joe Seldner tells of his
long, hard and ultimately
successful for his children
in his Parents Magazine
article
"My Fight to Keep My
Kids" (April, 2000).
Joe's trial by ordeal will
sound familiar to many of
you:
"The
nightmare began with a knock
on the door. On that hot August
afternoon in 1993, my wife
was out shopping, and the
kids, Dan, 9, and Laura, 6,
were at swimming lessons with
my parents, who had flown
in from New Jersey. The visitor
identified herself as a caseworker
for Child Protective Services
and told me that I had been
accused of physically abusing
my son. I laughed. She didn't.
When I asked who would make
such a ridiculous charge,
she said the information was
confidential. 'I'd like you
to leave,' I said, barely
containing my anger and incredulity.
Having dropped her bombshell,
she complied.
"When my wife got home,
she refused to discuss the
matter and referred me to
her lawyer. It was clear that
my accuser was the woman I
had been married to for ten
years. I had known our relationship
was in trouble, but I'd never
imagined she would do anything
like this. It felt as if someone
had hit me in the hack of
the head with a sledgehammer.
"Two days later the sheriff's
office served me with divorce
papers. The following week,
the caseworker came back to
interview both of the kids.
When she came downstairs afterward,
looking a little annoyed,
she declared there was nothing
to the allegations. I was
momentarily relieved -- but
the war had just begun."
Read the full article
here. To contact Joe,
click
here. |
Lisa
Scott Launches RealFamilyLaw.com
Shared Parenting Advocate/Family
Law Attorney Lisa Scott has
just launched
www.RealFamilyLaw.com
to expose the truth about
what is happening in our family
law system. Lisa, the all-time
leader in appearances on His
Side with Glenn Sacks,
says that she was "tired
of having her stuff rejected
by elitist bar publications
and politically-correct newspapers"
and decided to start her own
website.
www.RealFamilyLaw.com
Time for Family Fun Without
the Burning Sun
Have hours of the outdoors
with our children's fun but
functional sun protection.
Don't let sunburn, heat or
insects get in the way of
lifelong memories! Save
10% off your order with the
coupon code SACKS.
www.babysunprotection.com |
Kidnapping
is Kidnapping is Kidnapping
David L. Levy, CEO of
the Children's Rights Council,
had a nice letter to the editor
in the Washington Times
last week:
"We
grieve with the parents whose
Japanese children were abducted
by North Korean agents ('Japan
presses N. Korea to resolve
abduction issue,' World, Saturday).
"Congress
and the president were kind
to meet with the grieving
parents, but it is hypocritical
for Japan to complain about
the abduction of its children
while American children are
abducted to Japan with the
approval of the Japanese government.
"Japan
makes its position very clear
by refusing to join the 68
other countries that are signatories
to The Hague Convention on
the Civil Aspects of International
Child Abduction, which is
designed to prevent international
kidnapping.
"Walter
Benda of Max Meadows, Va.,
has not been able to visit
with his two daughters, now
17 and 15, for more than 10
years. The children, who were
born in the United States,
were taken by their Japanese
mother when they were 6 and
4, while the family was temporarily
residing near Tokyo. Mr. Benda
has spent countless time in
visits to Japan and has pursued
the case to the Japanese Supreme
Court to no avail.
"Japan
treats children as if they
were suitcases or pieces of
furniture -- that is, as the
property of the parent with
custody.
"This nefarious activity
in Japan starts at the top
-- with Japanese Prime Minister
Junichiro Koizumi. At the
time of his divorce, Mr. Koizumi
got custody of their two boys.
Their third child, who was
unborn at the time of the
divorce, was given to the
mother. Mr. Koizumi has never
taken the initiative to meet
the son born after the divorce,
and he has refused to allow
the mother to have any contact
with the older boys. This
is from an article in the
Washington Post by
Kathryn Tolbert on May 19,
2001.
"Japan
is a glass house, throwing
stones at North Korea while
hoping the world will ignore
its own abysmal record of
allowing the kidnapping and
hiding of U.S. children.
DAVID L. LEVY
CEO
Children's Rights Council
Hyattsville"
Canadian
Court Nails Jell-O to a Wall
In my co-authored
column
PBS Declares War on Dads
(World Net Daily, 10/20/05)
family law attorney Jeff Leving
and I discussed the hard struggle
so many noncustodial parents
face to get courts to properly
address Parental Alienation
Syndrome in their cases. We
wrote:
"As
a society we pretend that
broken families are all men's
fault, pay lip service to
the importance of fathers,
and close our eyes while millions
of children are separated
from the fathers they love
and need. Because that's what
mom wants. Because it's easier
to blame everything on dad
than it is to confront mom
on her destructive behavior.
Because trying to hold
a divorcing mother accountable
for her behavior is like trying
to nail Jell-O to a wall.
Because there's a high political
cost to be paid for crossing
mothers and none to be paid
for crossing fathers."
(emphasis added)
Well, last
week a Canadian court nailed
Jell-O to a wall. According
to the story
Mother loses kids after hindering
father's access:
"A
divorced woman who sabotaged
her children's relationship
with their estranged father
has been stripped of their
custody in a decision by Ontario's
top court which sends a message
that 'parental alienation'
harms children and will not
be tolerated.
"'We
recognize, as did the trial
judge, that the remedy of
granting custody to the father
is a dramatic one. However,
that remedy was supported
by the expert evidence and
by the mother's persistent,
ingrained and deep-rooted
inability to support the children's
relationship with the father,'
said three judges of the Ontario
Court of Appeal in a unanimous
decision this week.
"The
court dismissed the appeal
of the Jarvis, Ontario mother
against a lower court decision
last year which ordered that
the primary residence of her
five-year-old twin boys be
switched from the mother --
who had sole physical custody
of them since their birth
-- to her ex-husband who resides
in Hamilton.
"Calling
that decision 'amply supported
by the evidence,' the Appeal
Court said that although the
mother was 'otherwise a good
parent,' her persistent 'troublesome
conduct' against the children's
best interests included unilaterally
restricting the father to
daytime visits and failing
to inform him about the children's
medications, or to give him
their prescription drugs,
so that they would return
home from visits with him
sicker than when they left.
"Obstructed
access affects thousands of
divorced parents and their
children across Canada, according
to a 1998 parliamentary report
which urged the federal government
and the provinces and territories
to devise a nationwide co-coordinated
response to failed parenting
orders...
"The
appeal court was also critical
of the mother's unilateral
decision -- without warning,
just before the custody case
went to trial -- to uproot
the boys from their school
and community to move to another
town further away from their
father. 'Moreover, the mother
said that if the father moved
to her new town, she would
move again,' the Court of
Appeal noted.
"'This
conduct, in addition to many
other instances of alienating
conduct, was properly viewed
by the trial judge as evidence
of the mother's inability
to support the father's relationship
with the children and to consider
the best interests of the
children.'
"By
court order, the boys now
reside with their father,
but live with their mother
most weekends and see her
for mid-week evening visits."
The case
is also another example of
how move-aways are used by
alienating custodial parents
to destroy the relationships
between children and their
noncustodial parents. This
is one of the reasons our
two defeats of move-away legislation
in the California legislature
(click
here and
here) are so important. |
Tree
House Solutions
Tree House Solutions,
LLC is a growing and evolving
resource designed to meet
the emotional and informational
needs of parents who are going
through divorce and those
already divorced. Tree
House activities are composed
of live, real time teleconferences
on a weekly basis. These sessions
are conducted by two highly
experienced mental health
practitioners, versed in high
conflict divorce. Drs. Bone
and Evans offer a wide spectrum
of suggestions and education
regarding the divorce process
and co-parenting with difficult
former spouses.
www.treehousesolutions.org
Are You Really the Father?
Find out the underlying flaws
in the DNA paternity testing
system and learn how a man
with results in the 90%, 95%
or even 99% positive range
may not be the father. Learn
what most lawyers and judges
don't know about paternity
testing.
www.paternitytestflaw.com. |
Double-Standard
in Reporting on Male DV Victims
Dr.
Charles Corry, the leader
of the
Equal Justice Foundation,
the
American Coalition for Fathers
and Children affiliate
in Colorado, discusses the
recent murder of
Clifford Evans, a Denver,
Colorado male victim of domestic
violence. According to Corry:
"His
wife, Debra, had stabbed him
to death and if you Google
on Debra Evans you'll find
a few brief notes, e.g., the
Denver Post gives
it a few short paragraphs.
Typical when a woman kills
a man.
"What
isn't mentioned is that Debra
Evans, aka Debrah Wellington,
had two prior domestic violence
convictions, one in 2001 and
another as far back as 1990.
Presumably the 2001 conviction
required her to take the standard
36-week DV treatment program.
But perhaps she was one of
the 50% of convicted offenders
who never complete the program
because it certainly didn't
change her behavior.
"According
to a Fox News reporter, the
neighbors in the apartment
building had become inured
to the couple fighting, and
that Clifford was always the
victim. By any definition,
Debra Evans is a 'batterer'
but you'll never find that
out from the press. It hasn't
gone to trial yet but my guess
is she will be the 'battered
woman' then.
"But
imagine if Clifford had a
couple of prior DV convictions
and then killed Debra? Front
page, above the fold coverage
would be the norm. But since
Debra is the killer the case
can be buried by the press."
|
4TRUTH
IDENTITY: The Leader in Fast,
Accurate DNA Tests
If you're looking for a paternity
test, Paternity Fraud crusader
Carnell Smith's 4TRUTH IDENTITY
offers guaranteed, 100% accurate
identification services in
virtually every US state and
in several countries. Call
(404) 289-3321or click
here.
Online Support for Men Going
Through Divorce
Don't feel isolated, frightened,
confused or alone when going
through your divorce.
Get the help and support you
need without leaving your
home at the
Ottawa Divorce Forums.
www.OttawaDivorce.com/forum/ |
Anti-Father
CA Bill Pulled in Face of
Huge Opposition
In the face
of over 4,000 opposition calls,
letters and faxes, California
Senator Gloria Romero (D-Los
Angeles) has decided to withdraw
a bill which would have granted
custodial parents an almost
unlimited right to move children
far way from their noncustodial
parents. Romero pulled SB
1482 just before today's scheduled
hearing on the bill.
SB 1482 would
have weakened if not abrogated
the California Supreme Court's
2004 LaMusga move-away
decision, which affirmed that
courts have the power to restrain
moves which run counter to
children's best interests.
The bill
was supported by a wide array
of feminist groups and state-funded
pro-feminist organizations,
including the California National
Organization for Women, the
California Commission on the
Status of Women, the California
Partnership to End Domestic
Violence, the Coalition for
Family Equity, Haven Hills,
Inc., Marin Abused Women's
Services, Business and Professional
Women/USA, the National Council
of Jewish Women Los Angeles,
the Santa Clara County Domestic
Violence Advocacy Consortium,
and others.
Opposition
to the bill and unrestricted
move-aways was led by the
Alliance for Children Concerned
About Move-Aways, an advocacy
group endorsed by over
50 mental health and family
law professionals, and
Mike Robinson and the
California Alliance for Families
and Children. Several
organizations of family law
and mental health professionals
also opposed SB 1482,
including the California Judge's
Association, the California
Psychological Association,
and the State Bar of California's
Family Law Section. |
This
is the second time an attempt
by misguided feminists to
abrogate
LaMusga has been defeated.
From 1996 to 2004 move-away
determinations were based
on the Burgess decision,
which was interpreted by California
courts as conferring unlimited
move-away privileges. Under
Burgess the bonds between
tens of thousands of children
and their noncustodial parents
were needlessly ruptured.
The California
Supreme Court addressed the
problem in the
LaMusga decision
in April, 2004 by making
it clear that courts can prevent
children from being moved
when it is detrimental to
their interests. Among the
factors deemed important were
the relationship between the
child and the nonmoving parent.
In the summer
of 2004 then Senate President
John Burton, one of the most
powerful people in California,
introduced SB 730, a bill
which would have granted custodial
parents an almost unlimited
right to move children far
way from their noncustodial
parents.
We organized
opposition to SB 730, and
thousands of you wrote and
called Sacramento to oppose
the bill. Our campaign gained
widespread media attention
and was endorsed by numerous
mental health and family law
professionals. Burton
surprised Sacramento insiders
by
withdrawing the bill a
few weeks later.
When SB 1482
was originally introduced
in February, its language
was innocuous. The bill's
backers then made a sweeping,
last minute amendment to the
bill in order to slip it through
committee on April 25 before
opponents had a chance to
organize. We quickly organized
a deluge of calls and letters
in opposition. The hearing
on the bill was postponed
to May 9 and then the bill
was pulled.
As the
Alliance for Children Concerned
About Move-Aways noted
in its
position letter:
"SB
1482 will make it more difficult
for children of divorce to
retain the loving bonds they
share with both parents.
"SB
1482 specifically prohibits
a parent seeking to prevent
his or her children from being
moved far away from citing
most of the evidence that
could provide a basis for
restraining the move. Under
this bill, nonmoving parents
are prevented from citing
the move's impact on their
children's relationships with
them or the effects on the
children of losing their schools
and friends. This directly
abrogates current California
case law, which says that
the children's relationship
with their nonmoving parent
must be considered when deciding
a relocation case."
"The
LaMusga move-away case,
decided by the California
Supreme Court in 2004, is
a good example of the way
[under Burgess] custodial
parents were permitted to
move children far away without
justification. In that case
the mother sought to move
her two boys from the Bay
Area to Ohio because, she
claimed, she wanted to attend
a law school there. Apparently
none of the multitude of law
schools in the Bay Area sufficed.
Later she moved to Arizona
because, she explained, her
new husband needed work. His
job? Selling cars...
"Part
of the problem is that current
policies provide strong financial
incentives for moving. California
has a high child support guideline,
a high cost of living, and
high wages. Thus custodial
parents can often live better
by moving to states which
have a lower cost of living,
because they will still collect
child support awards based
on California wages and support
guidelines. This is a terrible
injustice to noncustodial
parents, who often must stay
behind to work to pay child
support for children who have
been moved out of their lives."
Thanks again
to the thousands of you who
wrote or called Sacramento
in opposition to SB 1482.
Victories Cost Money
The defeat
of SB 1482 once again shows
that shared parenting and
fatherhood advocates can win
victories if we are properly
organized and funded. To donate
to help our campaign via PayPal
or check, click
here.
Victories
cost money. In these battles
we are going up against large,
well-funded organizations
like the National Organization
for Women and numerous government-funded
domestic violence coalitions.
Too often the people on our
side kid ourselves that we
can compete against these
organizations without funding.
Again, to donate to help our
campaign via PayPal or check,
click
here. All donations--large
or small--help.
|
|
Allred,
Sacks Square off on SB 1482
on KABC in Los Angeles
I debated
Gloria Allred over SB 1482,
the new California move-away
bill, on the Al Rantel
Show on KABC AM 790 in
Los Angeles on Wednesday,
May 3 at 7 PM PST. Allred
won the 1996 Burgess
case in the California Supreme
Court, which gave custodial
parents an almost unlimited
right to move children whenever
they wanted, wherever they
wanted. I opened by saying
that Gloria had given the
people of California a "dubious
gift" with Burgess,
and Gloria replied that she
had won an important right
for custodial parents.
Gloria said
that it was unfair that the
LaMusga decision--currently
California case law which
SB 1482 threatens and which
we defend--restricts parents
with primary placement of
children (usually mothers)
from moving, while not restricting
parents without primary placement
(usually fathers). I replied
that all parents involved
are free to move wherever
they want--it is the children
who may not be moved if a
court determines that it is
against their best interests.
Gloria argued that restrictions
on move-aways keep custodial
parents "held hostage"
in their neighborhoods, and
that they should be able to
"move on with their lives."
I countered that both parents
retain responsibilities to
their children after divorce--responsibilities
which are at times inconvenient
or limiting. I asked if we
would we argue that noncustodial
parents' responsibility to
pay child support holds them
"hostage?"
Gloria and I have squared
off on these issue on several
occasions in the past, and
a few of my readers felt that
I was too nice to her during
the debate. I think a couple
of other readers understood
what I was doing a little
better:
"Glenn
came across as articulate,
reasonable, and calm. Allred
seemed disjointed. The moderator
seemed biased in Glenn's favor
and Glenn did not unnecessarily
use that to his advantage
as Allred would have done
if the reverse were true."
"Good debate, shows the
gap between the sides. It's
less about law, and more about
public policy and the opinions
that drive them. On her side,
'fathers need to step up to
the plate,' but when we do,
we are still irrelevant. Behind
money, boyfriends, houses,
and mom's convenience, here
we are. In her eyes the mother
divorces the father, and she
divorces the father from the
children. On our side, we
can show that the application
of Burgess has been
a disaster...You can't convert
people like Ms. Allred, but
you can give them enough rope
to hang themselves. You did
a good job, her sexist prejudice
against fathers came out loud
and clear, just enough rope
for tonight's show."
Glenn Discusses SB 1482 on
Hot 92 Jamz in Los
Angeles
I discussed
SB 1482, the new California
bill which will make it easier
for custodial parents to move
children away from noncustodial
parents, with Josefa Salinas
on Hot 92 Jamz FM 92.3 in
Los Angeles on May 7. |
The
Secrets of Happily Married
Men
How can a man achieve a long
and happy marriage? If you've
been checking out advice
columns or seeing a therapist,
you may have been looking
in the wrong place. Despite
all the advances in brain
technology, and all of that
we have learned about developmental
psychology--men and women
are given the same advice
about solving problems. But
when we ask men what works
for them, we hear a different
story.
www.SecretsofMarriedMen.com
How Does Sex Discrimination
Affect Men and Boys?
The
National Coalition of Free
Men is a non-profit educational
& civil rights organization
that looks at the ways sex
discrimination affects men
and boys.
NCFM helps provide men
a unified voice on important
political and social issues.
www.NCFM.org |
Column:
Memphis Commercial Appeal,
Chest-Thumping Sheriff Humiliate
Hard Luck Noncustodial Parents
My
recent co-authored column,
Memphis Commercial Appeal,
Chest-Thumping Sheriff Humiliate
Hard Luck Noncustodial Parents
(Tennessee Tribune,
4/27/06), discusses
recent attacks on Memphis
"deadbeat dads."
The column details numerous
examples of child support
enforcement publicly humiliating
innocent people. Family law
attorney Jeff Leving and I
wrote:
"Shelby
County Sheriff Mark Luttrell
recently published the names
and birthdays of 4,500 alleged
deadbeat parents in the Memphis
Commercial Appeal, Tennessee's
largest newspaper.
Luttrell states that he took
out the ads because the 9,000
parents for whom he has warrants
owe their children $75 million--$8,333
per parent. One man allegedly
owes $1.3 million. At the
same time, Luttrell's deputies
fanned out across largely
black South Memphis hunting
down 'deadbeats.' Both the
humiliating newspaper ads
and the police raids unfairly
target low-income parents...
"Child
support enforcement agencies
are notorious for their bureaucratic
bungling and incessant computer
errors. When other law
enforcement officials have
published 'deadbeat' parent
lists similar to Luttrell's,
innocent people have been
vilified and subjected to
public ridicule.
"For
example, when the Louisville
Courier-Journal published
the names and addresses of
1,000 alleged child support
scofflaws in July of last
year on behalf of Jefferson
County Attorney Irv Maze,
they listed James H. Frazier
as a deadbeat who owes $57,000.
Unfortunately, they listed
his name above the home address
of James R. Frazier.
"WAVE
3 TV in Louisville reported
that James R. Frazier and
his wife Bertha--both of whom
seethed at being publicly
humiliated--had been erroneously
targeted by Maze before, and
had spent years fighting to
straighten out the error.
In fact, Maze's office had
previously acknowledged its
mistake--and then went ahead
and published the erroneous
information anyway. In fact,
as of October 1--over two
months later--Maze still had
not corrected the error on
his list of 1,000 'deadbeats'
on the County Attorney's website.
"ABC
7 KGO News in San Francisco,
California has followed the
saga of Alex Mendez, a childless
man who has been mistakenly
targeted for alleged overdue
child support five times in
the past three years by two
different counties. After
embarrassing media coverage,
local enforcement officials
repeatedly pledged to fix
the error but have failed
to do so.
"The
list published by the
Commercial Appeal appears
to have similar problems.
Memphis' News Channel 3 WREG
quotes a juvenile court source
as saying that some of those
on the list may have already
paid their child support.
Nicholas Burchett of WREG
was shocked and angered to
find his father listed as
a 'deadbeat'--the man has
been dead for 14 years.
"Eyewitness
News-WPTY reports that the
Department of Human Services
lost thousands of dollars
of child support paid by Hugh
Jones of Memphis, leaving
Jones with a $10,000 child
support arrearage. According
to WPTY, DHS cashed Jones'
checks six times but, despite
Jones' detailed documentation,
has failed to credit his account.
WPTY reports that Jones 'has
to continue paying his child
support if he wants to remain
a free man' and avoid jail,
even though his 'debt' consists
of money he has already paid.
"In
the wake of the Louisville
ads Maze wrote a column in
which he claimed that his
policies 'make a clear distinction
between 'dead broke' and 'dead
beat' among child support
obligors.' As an example,
Maze explained 'One parent,
whose name is not on the list,
but who is behind in her payments,
contacted my office stating
that she had been unable to
find steady employment.'
"Yet
child support expert Jane
Spies of the National Family
Justice Association discovered
that although Maze says this
woman was not on his published
deadbeat list, in a previous
interview on National Public
Radio Maze spoke of the same
woman, and said she 'saw her
name in the newspaper' and
contacted him. In other words,
Maze admits that the woman
was too poor to pay her child
support, but he nevertheless
publicly humiliated her by
publishing her name and address.
Many if not most of those
targeted in Luttrell's raids
and Commercial Appeal
ads are in similar situations."
|
Legal
Help for Fathers
If you live in Los Angeles,
Riverside or Orange counties
and you're facing a divorce,
separation, or a child custody
issue, the law firm of Oddenino
& Gaule can help.
Congressional Candidate Takes
Strong Stand for Noncustodial
Parents' Rights
In 2004 Libertarian presidential
candidate Michael Badnarik
had a strong noncustodial
parents' rights
platform. Badnarik
is clearly aware of and sensitive
to the basic problems fathers
today face, particularly the
sole custody norm and the
denigration of noncustodial
parents to "second class
parent" status. Badnarik
is running for Congress in
2006--to learn more, go to
www.badnarik.org. |
Tiger
Woods' Father Remembered
Tiger Woods'
father Earl died recently
at age 74. Eugene Robinson
wrote in the
Washington Post:
"Earl
Woods did much more than raise
a supremely talented golfer.
In an age when it's rare to
read a sentence with the words
'African American' and 'father'
that doesn't also include
'absent' or some other pejorative,
Earl and Tiger Woods were
the world's most visible,
and inspiring, counterexample.
'He was the person I looked
up to more than anyone,' Tiger
Woods said following his father's
death, and even the world's
biggest cynic had to know
he meant every word.
"To
me, the two defining aspects
of Tiger Woods's career have
been his supernatural ability
to make a golf ball do impossible
things and his relationship
with his father. Two moments
stand out: The Sunday afternoon
in 1997 when Tiger became
the first black man ever to
win the Masters and cried
like a little boy in the arms
of his father, who was there
against doctor's orders after
almost dying in heart surgery.
And the Sunday afternoon in
2005 when Tiger won his fourth
Masters and cried again, because
Earl Woods, for the first
time, had been too sick to
come to the course and root
him on." |
|
PBS
films Fathers & Families
Meeting, Lobbying
A couple
weeks ago we updated you on
the situation regarding the
PBS controversy--see
An Announcement Regarding
Our Campaign Against PBS's
Anti-Father
Breaking the Silence.
We explained that "we
have been in talks with the
producers who are making the
new film on behalf of PBS,
and film crews will be filming
and conducting interviews
in New York, Connecticut,
Massachusetts, and other places
in April. Fathers & Families
members will be filmed April
27 and 28."
According
to Fathers & Families:
"About
200 men and women attended
Fathers & Families' general
membership meeting last Thursday,
April 27, at the Copley Westin
Hotel in downtown Boston.
The meeting, led by Dan Hogan,
was filmed by a PBS documentary
film crew. In addition, reporters
from several newspapers, including
the Christian Science Monitor
were on hand.
"Members were truly eloquent
in narrating how the current
system has torn their children
out of their lives, doing
great harm to the children
in the process. A Massachusetts
firefighter described how
a judge has made it virtually
impossible for him to be with
his children now that he is
a quadriplegic as a result
of an accident last year.
A Harvard Medical School gastroenterologist
provided perhaps the most
tragicomic and ironic anecdote.
Despite taking life-and-death
care of his patients, he described
how he has been prevented
from discussing his child's
health and has had to defend
himself against charges that
he caused his son's constipation!
"The meeting culminated
a day in which the PBS crew
followed Ned Holstein as he
patrolled the State House,
meeting with legislators and
aides to advocate for shared
parenting. PBS also filmed
interviews in the F&F
office.
"The evening event drew
such a large crowd that additional
meeting space had to be opened
up to accommodate all who
wished to get in.
"Dan Hogan began by introducing
the staff, consultants, interns
and regular volunteers for
Fathers & Families. These
15 people demonstrate that
Fathers & Families is
growing at a fast rate.
"Representative Colleen
Garry of Dracut, the leading
legislative sponsor of our
shared parenting bill, received
a standing ovation for her
powerful speech supporting
shared parenting. Kevin Thompson
fired up the partisan crowd
with his account of the banning
of his book, Exposing the
Corruption in the Massachusetts
Family Courts. Jeff Parks
discussed the healing powers
of parental alienation groups
and the role that political
activism can play in the healing
process. Dan Hogan, after
updating us on the status
of shared parenting around
the country and world, called
for the fathers' movement
to reach out and begin a dialogue
with our opponents, especially
the domestic violence movement.
And Ned Holstein closed the
meeting by speaking movingly
about what it really means
to be a father.
"Thanks to all who took
the time to attend. When the
PBS documentary is aired,
it will show that the fathers'
movement is one that fills
the house to overflowing.
And most important, it will
show that we care deeply about
our children."
Best Wishes,
Glenn Sacks
GlennSacks.com
HisSide.com |
|
Subscribe
to this E-Newsletter
Email this E-Newsletter to
a Friend
Missed an E-Newsletter? Find
all of Glenn's E-Newsletters
here
GlennSacks.com /
HisSide.com
To
be removed from our list,
send an email to
remove@glennsacks.com
with the subject line "Remove." |
|
|
|
|
|