Political Parallels In Breaking

Read from the bottom up for the chronological thread discussion that happened here.

Nice analysis Mark. To add my two cents, which I hope doesn’t muddle the discussion:

In the 1917 Revolution, a bunch of middle and lower class thugs overthrew (and murdered) the ruling class. They replaced the ruling ideology and morality (basically capitalistic and Christian) with their own godless communism. With no understanding of human nature, and no economic sense, and lacking any corporate experience, and despite much help initially from the US, the Soviet experiment ultimately failed in our lifetimes.

The American revolution of the twentieth century could more accurately be called an evolution. Basically, under President Roosevelt, the ruling, capitalist elite starting controlling the people by taking as much as possible from the middle class without causing a revolution, and giving as much of this as necessary to the lower class to prevent a revolution. With their deft capitalistic and management experience, they have so far managed to keep things in balance and to provide enough material wealth to prevent a revolution.

At the same time, our constitutional, republican form of government has become almost unrecognizable. While the American elite have always controlled the government, they do so now without the minimal democratic input of past ages. The judges of their appointment make the decisions they desire, and when the people complain they pretend the decisions are out of their hands.

Corresponding to this national-socialistic evolution in government, the elite’s morality and ideology has also undergone an evolution. The official position of the ruling elite has gone from nominally Christian and paternalistic to pagan/atheist and maternalistic. The one group that epitomizes this new morality is the National Organization of (Lesbian) Women.

Which brings me to my first point: There is much similarity between the failed communist system and the modern American system. Women are encouraged to work to increase the tax base and thus government control. Children are placed in daycare and government schools to decrease the strength of the family and increase the government’s power. Homosexuality, free sex and deviation are encouraged to distract the people and destroy their families. Divorce is encouraged to put greater and greater percentages of the population under direct government control without any due process of law. American men and boys are intentionally being destroyed by our nanny state which favors women. As Mark says, the people responsible for this aren’t communists, but many of the results sure look the same.

The good news is that if you understand the problem, you should be able to find a solution. If you think we live in a democracy and can solve this problem by merely writing your congressman, you probably don’t belong on this list. But if you want to face reality, and if you understand what we are up against, you might find that our opponents are a lot more vulnerable than they appear.

For starts, a good percentage, maybe a majority, of the elite are uncomfortable with the extreme feminist morality. For now they go along because their main interest is their fortunes, and they don’t want to risk civil war over a few (million) aborted babies or fatherless kids. But they understand that this morality is not being accepted by the American population. I think at the first sign of serious revolution, they will cave in and toss the feminists to the wolves. This revolution has begun, and we will not stop until we peaceably restore the Constitution and the role of fathers and families in American society.

Mike O